Crew Reviews, Ratings & Info for Levanto

In a surprising turn of events, the Nigerian Navy has acknowledged that the recent arrest of the merchant vessel 'ST Vanessa' was due to a misunderstanding. Initially detained on suspicions of oil theft, authorities have expressed regret over the incident. Following the apology, both the ST Vanessa and its crew have been released, marking a swift resolution to the situation. This case highlights the importance of thorough investigations in maritime operations to avoid such errors in the future.

In a recent revelation, the Nigerian Navy has confirmed that the seized vessel, St. Vanessa, which earlier reports suggested was loaded with a staggering 8.5 million barrels of stolen crude oil, is actually devoid of any crude on board. This statement was made by Vice Admiral Ola Ibrahim, the Chief of Naval Staff (CNS), during a session with the House Joint Committee investigating the alarming rise in illegal bunkering activities. The committee's chairman, Muraina Ajibola, previously stated that the ship contained the substantial amount of stolen oil, prompting the formation of a sub-committee aimed at investigating the validity of these assertions. Furthermore, it has been decided that the Navy will transfer custody of the St. Vanessa to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for proper safekeeping, amidst growing concerns over maritime security in the Niger Delta region. The Defence Headquarters (DHq) has also issued new protocols for the operation of boats and barges in these waters to enhance oversight and minimize illegal activities.

On June 19, 2012, at approximately 1520 LT, the Belgian tanker St Vanessa was apprehended by the Nigerian Navy while navigating off the Brass/Akassa coast in the Brass Local Government Area of Bayelsa. The vessel had recently completed cargo operations, departing from Lome, Togo, on June 5th. It was en route to the Akassa/Brass region, where reports indicated that the tanker drifted roughly 100 miles offshore during the day and approached the coast, within 10 miles, at night. The Nigerian Navy had flagged the St Vanessa as a potential participant in illegal bunkering due to its suspicious movement patterns, monitoring the tanker closely in the days leading up to its arrest. According to Navy officials, "On June 19, 2012, at about 1520, NNS ZARIA intercepted the vessel and interrogated her." In a bid to escape, the tanker was pursued for three hours before being apprehended and escorted to Bonny anchorage for further investigation. On June 26, Nigerian authorities publicly displayed the 15-member crew, which included six Romanians and nine Filipinos, to the media. The vessel's owner faced considerable scrutiny, unable to justify the tanker’s ambiguous movements without a clear operational purpose. This incident raises critical questions regarding the Nigerian Navy's actions. Why did the Navy wait two weeks to intercept a vessel they were monitoring when it entered Nigerian territorial waters at night? The failure to issue a warning or order the tanker to exit the area has led to speculation that the Navy was actively trying to catch the vessel in the act of illegal activities. Moreover, were the Navy's actions legal if the St Vanessa was pursued and apprehended in international waters? Reports suggest that the vessel was initially drifting offshore, and this has prompted concerns about the legality of apprehending a foreign vessel in such circumstances. As the Nigerian authorities ramp up their efforts to combat illegal bunkering, it becomes imperative to scrutinize the legality of their methods and the implications for international maritime law. For more on maritime developments, visit the Maritime Bulletin at http://www.odin.tc.