Reviews & Ratings for the One-Milano

The allision involving the 'Milano Bridge' in Busan, which occurred on April 6, has been linked primarily to excessive speed during docking procedures. Investigators from Ocean Network Express (ONE) highlighted that a combination of factors contributed to this maritime incident, including reduced reaction time post-turning, inadequate tugboat effectiveness due to the ship’s rapid forward motion, and ineffective bow thruster use. Further scrutiny revealed that the crew had failed to consider the ship's empty status and the resultant submersion of its rudder. They also appeared not to have accurately gauged local weather conditions, nor did they fully comprehend the pilot's directives, which led to panic as the vessel approached the dock. Following the allision, only one of the six gantry cranes at the dock remained operational. The Korean Maritime Safety Tribunal, part of the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, has determined that excessive speed, coupled with a propeller that was partially out of the water due to inadequate ballast, significantly hampered the vessel's maneuverability. The shortfall of ballast water was a critical factor, as it left approximately one-third of the propeller above the water's surface when the vessel entered the port. The 'Milano Bridge' was en route to a Chinese shipyard without cargo for repairs and approached the quay at a speed of eight knots—two knots over the standard docking speed of six knots. Investigators, utilizing data from crew statements and accident imagery, conducted simulations of the events to gain insights into the situation at the time of the incident. Their findings indicated that a fully submerged propeller enhances steering control, significantly reducing the possibility of an accident. Calculated assessments determine that had the ship been traveling at speeds below seven knots, the allision could have been averted. Following the incident, the 'Milano Bridge' successfully docked at Chang Xing Dao Port in Dalian on May 5 at 7:30 a.m. for the necessary repairs.

In a significant maritime incident at Busan's North Terminal International Terminal, the container vessel 'Milano Bridge' collided with three container cranes on April 6, 2020, at approximately 2 p.m. local time. The vessel, navigating with the assistance of a pilot, was attempting to dock at berth 8 after arriving from Shanghai when it struck cranes numbered 81, 84, and 85 during cargo operations at berth 7. The collision resulted in a harrowing escape for the 44-year-old operator of crane 85, who leaped five meters to avoid serious injury, suffering only minor ankle injuries requiring hospital treatment. Following the impact, crane 85 collapsed, while cranes 81 and 84 were displaced from their rails, rendering them immobile. Additionally, crane 81 was left at a precarious angle, increasing the risk of further collapse. Prior to the allision, the 'Milano Bridge' had also made contact with the 'Seaspan Ganges' at the same berth. Initial assessments indicated that replacing gantry crane 85 might take up to 18 months, while restoring crane 84 to operational status could take between 3 to 5 months, provided there is no significant structural damage. Fortunately, cranes 82 and 83 appeared to have sustained minimal damage during the incident. The Busan Coast Guard is currently investigating the circumstances surrounding this incident, which has raised concerns over port safety protocols. Following the collision, the 'Milano Bridge' was successfully berthed at the Hanjin NewPort Container Terminal by 8 a.m. on April 7. However, the vessel sustained substantial damage, including a broken lashing bridge structure, deformed port side upper deck plating, and buckled handrails on both sides of the upper deck. Subsequently, the ship shifted to Busan anchorage on April 8. For more visuals and detailed reports, visit the following links: [SeaNews](https://www.seanews.com.tr/containership-milano-bridge-allided-with-cranes-in-busan-one-injured/186443/), [Korea Military News](http://m.kmib.co.kr/view.asp?arcid=0014448949), [Daily Log](http://www.dailylog.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=20022#09sf), and a related [YouTube video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTQKqNN8j3Q).